Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Chinese Journal of Postgraduates of Medicine ; (36): 883-886, 2017.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-661878

ABSTRACT

Objective To investigate the effect of 3S jejunal interposition anastomosis in digestive tract reconstruction after radical resection for early gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. Methods One hundred and eighteen patients of early gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma who were planned to receive radical proximal gastrectomy from February 2011 to August 2015 were prospectively enrolled and randomly divided into two groups by table of random number, including observation group (3S jejunal interposition) and control group (esophageal remnant gastric posterior wall anastomosis), with 59 patients in each group. Postoperative complications, operative time, nutritional parameters and postoperative quality of life were compared between two groups. Results The operation time in observation group was (152.3 ± 13.1) min, in control group was (146.0 ± 12.5) min, and there was no significant difference (P>0.05). The rate of complication in observation group was 8.5%(5/59), in control group was 13.6%(8/59), and there was no significant difference (P>0.05). The levels of total protein, albumin, hemoglobin, and Vitamin B126, 12, and 18 months after operation in observation group were significantly higher than those in control group (P<0.05). The rate of reflux esophagitis 6, 12 and 18 months after operation in observation group was significantly lower than that in control group (P<0.05). The gastric emptying time 6, 12 and 18 months after operation in observation group was significantly prolonged, compared with that in control group (P<0.05). The scores of whole quality of life, emotional function, body function, pain, tired, appetite, nausea and vomiting, diarrhea and constipation 6 and 18 months after operation in observation group were significantly better than those in control group (P<0.05). Conclusions The 3S jejunal interposition anastomosis in digestive tract reconstruction after radical resection for early gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma is a better method. The effect of antirelux is better and can improve the nutriture and quality of live for long time.

2.
Chinese Journal of Postgraduates of Medicine ; (36): 883-886, 2017.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-658959

ABSTRACT

Objective To investigate the effect of 3S jejunal interposition anastomosis in digestive tract reconstruction after radical resection for early gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. Methods One hundred and eighteen patients of early gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma who were planned to receive radical proximal gastrectomy from February 2011 to August 2015 were prospectively enrolled and randomly divided into two groups by table of random number, including observation group (3S jejunal interposition) and control group (esophageal remnant gastric posterior wall anastomosis), with 59 patients in each group. Postoperative complications, operative time, nutritional parameters and postoperative quality of life were compared between two groups. Results The operation time in observation group was (152.3 ± 13.1) min, in control group was (146.0 ± 12.5) min, and there was no significant difference (P>0.05). The rate of complication in observation group was 8.5%(5/59), in control group was 13.6%(8/59), and there was no significant difference (P>0.05). The levels of total protein, albumin, hemoglobin, and Vitamin B126, 12, and 18 months after operation in observation group were significantly higher than those in control group (P<0.05). The rate of reflux esophagitis 6, 12 and 18 months after operation in observation group was significantly lower than that in control group (P<0.05). The gastric emptying time 6, 12 and 18 months after operation in observation group was significantly prolonged, compared with that in control group (P<0.05). The scores of whole quality of life, emotional function, body function, pain, tired, appetite, nausea and vomiting, diarrhea and constipation 6 and 18 months after operation in observation group were significantly better than those in control group (P<0.05). Conclusions The 3S jejunal interposition anastomosis in digestive tract reconstruction after radical resection for early gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma is a better method. The effect of antirelux is better and can improve the nutriture and quality of live for long time.

3.
Chinese Journal of Postgraduates of Medicine ; (36): 38-41, 2014.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-467025

ABSTRACT

Objective To investigate the antireflux effect of esophagogastrostomy combined with modified Nissen fundoplication after esophageal middle cancer resection.Methods Eighty-two patients with esophageal middle cancer were divided into 2 groups by random digits table method,41 cases underwent esophagogastrostomy with a stapler only (control group),41 cases underwent esophagogastrostomy with stapler combined with modified Nissen undoplication (observation group).Three months after surgery,the patients of the 2 groups completed the research of EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire,and examined with esophageal manometry and gastroscopy.Results There was no statistical difference in incidence of postoperative complication between the 2 groups (P > 0.05),death was not found during peroperative period.The scores of heart burn and regurgitation in observation group [(13.2 ± 6.1) and (16.9 ± 3.9) scores] were significantly lower that those in control group [(25.6 ± 7.2) and (26.6 ± 4.2) scores],there were statistical differences (P < 0.05),but there was no statistical difference in score of dysphagia between the 2 groups (P > 0.05).The resting pressure of anastomotic site in observation group [(3.5 ± 2.3) mmHg,1 mmHg =0.133 kPa] was significantly higher than that in the stomach [(2.7 ± 2.1) mmHg],there was statistical difference (P< 0.05).The DeMeester score was (54 ± 32) scores,control group was (141 t 84) scores,there was statistical difference (P < 0.05).The incidence of reflux esophagitis in observation group was 48.8%(20/41),in control group was 75.6%(31/41),there was statistical difference (P < 0.05).Conclusions Esophagogastrostomy combined with modified Nissen fundoplication after esophageal middle cancer resection significantly increases the pressure at the anastomotic site,thus reduces the extent of gastroesophageal reflux,which leads to the reduction of the extent of reflux esophagitis and the improvement of the quality of life.

4.
Journal of Kunming Medical University ; (12): 44-46, 2013.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-438488

ABSTRACT

Objective To study wether dezocine (DZ) can attenuate neuropathic pain in rats and to investigate its mechanism.Methods Neuropathic pain was induced by tight ligation of the left L5 spinal nerve of the male SD rats. 24 Spinal nerve ligation (SNL) model rats were randomly divided into three groups:the first group (saline group, n=8), rats were given intraperitoneal injection of 1ml of saline 14 days after SNL surgery; the second group (dezocine group, n=8), rats were given intraperitoneal injection of 5mg/kg of dezocine in 1ml saline 14 days after SNL surgery;the third group (morphine group,n=8),rats were given intraperitoneal injection of 5 mg/kg of morphine 14 days after SNL surgery. Results Intraperitoneal injection dezocine and morphine had significant analgesic effect in neuropathic pain rats. This analgesic effect lasted for 4-6 hours.Continuous injection of morphine for 3 days produced significant tolerance, while continuous injection of dezocine for 7 days still had significant analgesic effect on neuropathic pain. Conclusion Intraperitoneal injection of dezocine and morphine can attenuate SNL neuropathic pain, continuous injection of morphine for 3 days can produce significant tolerance, while continuous injection of dezocine for 7 days still has significant analgesic effect on neuropathic pain.

5.
Chinese Journal of Anesthesiology ; (12): 1296-1298, 2011.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-417588

ABSTRACT

ObjectiveTo compare the intraoperative wake-up test in patients undergoing scoliosis surgery with different anesthesia methods.MethodsForty ASA Ⅰ patients aged 13-18 yr with body mass index < 30 kg/m2 scheduled for scoliosis surgery were randomly divided into 2 groups ( n =20 each): propofol combined sufentanil anesthesia group (group P) and sevoflurane combined sufentanil anesthesia group (group S).Anesthesia was induced with target-controlled infusion of sufentanil(target effect-site concentration 0.5 ng/ml),and iv injection of etomidate 0.3 mg/kg in both groups.Tracheal intubation was facilitated with 0.15 mg/kg cisatracurium when patients lost consciousness.The patients were mechanically ventilated.Anesthesia was maintained with target-controlled inhalation of sevoflurane (target end-tidal concentration 0.8%-1.5% ) in group S,and target-controlled infusion of propofol (target plasma concentration 3-5 μg/ml) in group P,and target-controlled infusion of sufentanil (target effect-site concentration 0.2-0.3 ng/ml),and iv infusion of cisatracurium 0.1 mg· kg-1· h-1 in both groups.BIS value was maintained at 40-60.Cisatracurium administration was terminated and target effect-site concentration of sufentanil decreased to 0.1 ng/ml before wake-up test,5 min later,sevoflurane and propofol administration were terminated,and 5 min later wake-up test was performed.MAP and HR were recoreded during wake-up test.The wake-up time and advers effect (bucking,restlessness and awareness)were recorded.Results The wake-up time was significantly shorter in group S than in group P( P < 0.05).MAP and HR were in normal range during wake-up test in both groups,and bucking,restlessness and awareness were not found in both groups.ConclusionTarget-controlled inhalation of ssvoflurane combined with sufentanil can be safely and effectively used for intraoperative wake-up test in patients undergoing scoliosis surgery,and the wake-up time is shorter than that with propofol combined sufentanil,and it is an apporiate anesthetic technique for the intraoperative wake-up test.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL